From rising compliance risks to declining tray accuracy, a four-site hospital system needed urgent support. ASSI delivered a data-driven plan and long-term partnership to stabilize and strengthen sterile processing operations.

Overview

A four-site hospital system in the Atlantic region partnered with ASSI to address ongoing performance and compliance issues in sterile processing. ASSI conducted a clinical assessment that revealed critical risks in quality assurance and bioburden control, resulting in below-standard performance scores. Following the assessment, the client engaged ASSI for a 52-week consulting partnership to guide improvement, reduce risk, and rebuild operational confidence across all locations.

Client

Hospital System 

Year

2025

Region
Atlantic region U.S.
Solutions provided
  • Clinical assessment
  • Ongoing Consulting

We truly appreciated the visit to our facility and the thoughtful feedback provided during the review of our current operations. The communication throughout the process was excellent, and the professionalism displayed during the review did not go unnoticed. We look forward to our future partnership.

Perioperative Services Business Manager

The challenge

The Sterile Processing Department (SPD) was operating under considerable strain, with performance concerns across core functional areas threatening the safety and efficiency of surgical services. Internal teams struggled to maintain consistent quality standards, and leadership lacked clear visibility into the root causes of recurring issues.

Facing rising concerns about compliance, patient safety, and surgeon satisfaction, the facility sought outside expertise to conduct a structured evaluation, stabilize operations, and guide leadership toward corrective action. Advantage Support Services was brought in to perform a Clinical Assessment and provide a foundation for sustainable improvement.

Our approach

ASSI conducted a clinical assessment focused on six core areas: Assembly, Sterilization, Sterile Storage, Decontamination, Quality, and Bioburden Reduction.

Key actions included:

  • On-site observational audits across all major SPD functions
  • Grading each area using a best-practice compliance matrix
  • Identifying urgent risks in bioburden control and QA systems
  • Engaging executive leadership to align on next steps

The final report included detailed scores, strengths, gaps, and actionable recommendations, laying the foundation for sustained improvement.

Findings

Assessment results

Client satisfaction survey results

Instrument quality
1.8
Tray accuracy
1.8
Bioburden frequency
2.3
Instrument availability
2.1
Case cart quality
2.1
Case cart completion
2.4
Tray turnover efficiency
2.2

Assessment outcomes

42
Compliance dangers
74
Improvement opportunities
117
Meets standards
18
Best practices

Average department grade

Lowest
65
Average
73.92
Highest
78.9

Impact